stimulus :

"There can be a known known only if theres a known unknown, but there can never be an unknown unknown without a known unknown. Thus, every unknown unknown which is known is actually a known unknown which is unknown."

question : the conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

the content of this question is inspired by the "Rumsfeld Matrix." What would be a sufficient assumption for this question? Is this a hard question or did you find it on the easier end of SA questions?

0

5 comments

  • Thursday, Mar 14 2024

    SA: A. Regardless of what the premises state, every unknown unknown which is known is actually a known unknown which is unknown.

    SA: B. Any thing we do not understand and do not know of that we become aware of is truly only a thing we are aware of and do not understand that we were unaware of.

    Going with A

    0
  • Wednesday, Mar 13 2024

    Lol you scared me dude. I thought this was on a PT and I was like please bffr, LSAT.

    1
  • Wednesday, Mar 13 2024

    .

    0
  • Wednesday, Mar 13 2024

    i wrote it lol its not an actual question. i just love how confusing it is

    0
  • Tuesday, Mar 12 2024

    what's the pt/section/question number? you can tell based on if its a 5 star question/ you can view what percentile ppl scored in based on how they answered that question

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?