Suddenly I click out of a lesson on science passages and I'm only a quarter way through reading comp...
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
A cruise ship from Turks and Caicos, being driven by a crew made up of dolphins, was taken over by pirates. All of the dolphin crew was executed and when the pirates got to Hawaii, their dream vacation destination, they dumped the dolphins overboard. The dolphins were swept away in a current that brought their bodies to that specific beach.
This is a gorgeous answer
This is the most brilliant way it's ever been explained to me. "Unless" has never been easier.
6.2
confused → /aware
aware → /confused
6.5
puzzled → unfamiliar
/unfamiliar → /puzzled
he kept the un- in one and dropped it in the other, why is that?
You can't get the contrapositive of a most statement. The statement reads WD m--> FA. That's how it has to be read. /WD draws no conclusions anyway, it's the sufficient.
I am in the same boat. But it isn't about the result, it's about the process. Your mind is growing sharper. The one thing I have changed is that I now have broadened the path toward my goal. Instead of one school being essential to reaching it, I now have several that would be equally acceptable. Good luck, keep grinding.
"many" threw me off E because of the some before some flaw. I reasoned that some at one company shouldn't support some at another.
Can anyone further explain the difference between these two uses of "amount(s)", and how to identify this discrepancy next time?
The process of manufacturing concrete produces large amounts of carbon dioxide that can escape into the atmosphere.
Subject: carbon
The amount of nitrogen in the atmosphere is proportional to atmospheric pressure.
Subject: the amount
Well said. This part of the curriculum is one of the main reasons I chose this course.
Why on this did we accept the statements that negated the premises as weakeners? So we can weaken arguments by directly calling out premises for being false? I thought that was something to be avoided since contradicting the premise is a trap answer. Rather, we take the stimulus as true and break the connection between the "true" premises and the conclusion.
I'm glad they did, I'm sure it's an improved version; we will be better for it in the long run. I just had to laugh because I was excited to get to the end today and into some PTs.
Mine is doing the same thing, I can't join live classes either