Dumb question but how do we know the author provides perspective here? Maybe silly but I read it as just introducing a perspective, not necessarily the author's... Is it just a thing that when a new perspective is introduced in this manner it is the author telling us this?
@AthleticWonderfulWhile Yeah, if there's a perspective, but the author doesn't attribute it to someone (doesn't say this person/group thinks, some people claim, etc.), then that means it's the author telling us what she thinks. So in the last sentence, who is the person characterizing the legal results as "problematic"? It's the author.
7 comments
"fictional fantasy world of Alaska" bye lmfao
the fictional world of alaska, i wish they made it irl
I'm not a crook.
Dumb question but how do we know the author provides perspective here? Maybe silly but I read it as just introducing a perspective, not necessarily the author's... Is it just a thing that when a new perspective is introduced in this manner it is the author telling us this?
@AthleticWonderfulWhile Yeah, if there's a perspective, but the author doesn't attribute it to someone (doesn't say this person/group thinks, some people claim, etc.), then that means it's the author telling us what she thinks. So in the last sentence, who is the person characterizing the legal results as "problematic"? It's the author.
@AthleticWonderfulWhile I’m glad you asked this question because I was thinking the same thing!
This was my previous days study plan reading comprehension passage. Not sure why its here again