Someone (Bailey I think?) on the 7Sage podcast said that they skip around half of the questions on the first pass through any section. Then they go back and scoop up more and maybe flag one or two to go back to at the very end. Going to try this on some PTs. It makes sense especially as you’re getting into the groove.
But how do you know which ones are the "hard" ones? Do you read all of them first, or do you just assume that the long questions are the most difficult?
This is a dumb question, but if we skip a question and don't have time to go back and do it thoroughly, should we fill in a random bubble just to have an answer in there? or leave it blank completely?
I heard a good LR analogy that ironically is also about trees, which summarizes the idea in the last paragraphs: don't sacrifice the forest for one silly tree
Will you get punished for leaving it blank? Or should you fill in every answer even if you aren't sure (making a quick educated guess)? I hate leaving questions blank and so isn't it better giving yourself a 1 in 5 chance of getting it right instead of no chance? #feedback
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
14 comments
Yes, I really need to start doing this!
THIS IS SUCH A GREAT ANALOGY THANK YOU
Those are macadamia nuts, which are delicious nuts. A coconut is also delicious, but is not a nut.
macadamia nut → delicious
coconut → delicious
coconut → /nut
Someone (Bailey I think?) on the 7Sage podcast said that they skip around half of the questions on the first pass through any section. Then they go back and scoop up more and maybe flag one or two to go back to at the very end. Going to try this on some PTs. It makes sense especially as you’re getting into the groove.
But how do you know which ones are the "hard" ones? Do you read all of them first, or do you just assume that the long questions are the most difficult?
This is a dumb question, but if we skip a question and don't have time to go back and do it thoroughly, should we fill in a random bubble just to have an answer in there? or leave it blank completely?
I heard a good LR analogy that ironically is also about trees, which summarizes the idea in the last paragraphs: don't sacrifice the forest for one silly tree
Will you get punished for leaving it blank? Or should you fill in every answer even if you aren't sure (making a quick educated guess)? I hate leaving questions blank and so isn't it better giving yourself a 1 in 5 chance of getting it right instead of no chance? #feedback
Oops
Strong argument by analogy!