This is a sufficiency-necessary confusion flaw taken to its extreme, and also a rare question that asks for double flaws. Always watch out for any sufficiency-necessary indicators in the stimulus and see if they try to do anything with it. But bear in mind that the harder ones cover them very well with heavy usage of abstract language and confusing sentence structures.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
3 comments
PT 64 Sec 1 Q24
thanks
Check out PT59 Section3 Q22.
This is a sufficiency-necessary confusion flaw taken to its extreme, and also a rare question that asks for double flaws. Always watch out for any sufficiency-necessary indicators in the stimulus and see if they try to do anything with it. But bear in mind that the harder ones cover them very well with heavy usage of abstract language and confusing sentence structures.