@Kevin_Lin So, in my opinion, I just felt like it was messy. For example, instead of starting off with what is a phenomenon, maybe mentioning from the beginning that this another form of an argument(how the stimulus will present itself, which is a causal relationship form), where the premise(s) is a phenomenon and conclusion is a hypothesis. And then giving an example and defining phenomenon and hypothesis. After that mentioning how the test makers try and bait us. And how we can beat them to it (alternative explanation, third factor, and reverse causality). I just felt it was messy (sequence), and maybe a more thorough explanation of this concept.

This explanation video was not the greatest.

@TeklaCo #1 and #4, if possible.

@TeklaCo you mind explaining?

@alinabkh Hi, you click on the question and on the top right it has EXPLANATION.

@Elideebeep thank you for sharing :)

Happy belated birthday!! 🎂🎉

@KeziaH19 Hi, I am from TX but we can figure something out. :)

@asanchez I think you should go back and relearn it. If you continue you will not understand it well enough and that can mess you up later.

So, if I am just skimming through the stimulus to find the conclusion, and have been getting all of the questions right, does that mean it is okay for me to skim through the stimulus or am I careless?

@PatrickNovoa can you share the link

@EmilyMacaluso no it does not. The relationship is different. The if/then is a sufficiency and necessity (a guarantee if you have the sufficient) and the some is of intersection (more of an over lap).

An example of a real LSAT question should be inserted in this lesson.

I believe he did #3 wrong on the video because under the answer tab it is different.

@sxphs and you do that for any conditional indicator? From any group?

@sxphs can you post an example. Please?! LOL

an example of this happening would have been great!

@Veronic you are comparing the same thing (any other nations v. any other nations)

for #3 a nation v. any other (this is what is being compared)

what is being measured, is how to maintain a retaliatory force?

and what is maintaining a retaliatory force good for? to maximize deterrence from aggression from other nations

so if you maintain retaliatory force you are the winner, so the nation is the winner

hope this helps

This is a great explanation.

@anzbel Hi, you mention you wrote out every LR approach to every question, sorry if it sounds dumb, how did you do this? And what did you use? How did you frame it?

@LaylaCDickerson Hi, im from the deep South Texas. A few hours from SA. If that works.