Wow. THINGS ARE CLICKING

I literally have gotten every single question wrong on this passage!!!!

are you all writing down your low res summaries or doing it mentally?

I'm so happy I never have to see this question again

This was an awesome video. I liked the thought process of breaking down the stimulus

Can someone remind me what "unless" triggers? Is "unless" always followed by a necessary condition?

Is there a resource that highlights all of these rules high-level? For example, most + most = no valid conc.?

I feel like I eliminated C quickly because upon first glance I thought being a member of a school chess team would be irrelevant. How do I stop myself from eliminating words based on phrases? Sometimes it helps and sometimes it comes back to bite me

I was weary of answer choice B at first because it said increased, and the conclusion was based on reducing crime (not helping to reduce crime) - am I thinking too literally here?

Is there an updated wrong answer journal link? it says page not found?

Approval was the key to the question here and I totally overlooked it because I was focused on what things in the passage were implicitly stated versus explicitly stated.

I feel like I am able to detect the part of the argument that needs to be attacked to weaken it, but I am struggling to make the proper assumptions or inferences of the answer choices to understand if it would weaken it. For example, I was able to get to the "most reliable" piece of the argument and hone in on that, but chose E first and then C in BR. Any tips or advice?

Can someone please further explain why D is incorrect? I am having a brain fart on what the correct sufficient and necessary conditions are?

@tommydoonan I did the same thing :(

Is it correct to say that answer choice B is correct because if none of the motors manufactured by EM are quiet enough, then they cannot be sound-insulated, because being quiet enough is a necessary condition for being sound-insulated? This was my method of thinking to select answer choice B in BR.

@colewmurdoch391 376

@AlexCaches Answering my own question as I didn't read carefully enough and see that acknowledging that one acting wrongfully is a necessary condition for both giving a sincere apology and sincerely accepting an apology.

I am not understanding why we can assume there is a link between apologizing sincerely and accepting an apology? I automatically eliminated those answer choices at first

Can someone remind me the rule with necessary assumption questions? If you negate the answer choice, and it doesn't fit the argument, is that your answer?

This is the first passage I did not do any highlighting on and I did significantly worse. How to people approach these passages on the interface? Do you summarize the paragraphs on physical scrap paper?

@gonewiththewind Are we able to control F on the actual test day?

Only 15 seconds over!

UNDER 12 SECONDS AND CORRECT FINALLY

Getting this correct is making me jump for joy

Is the basic example an example of what is wrong (the flaw)? in other words, is the basic example the "wrong" way of thinking?