I didn't want to assume that Acme had switched out the switches before the wreck as it was never said explicitly. I therefore left room for the possibility that it could have been done after the wreck which would mean they didn't know it was a hazard but they do now...ergo why I thought E was wrong and chose A. Can someone explain why that was poor reasoning?
Commenting because, like many others, NA was/is a difficult concept for me. The analysis of the “one vs. multiple responsibilities” perspective wasn’t something I initially considered when reviewing this paragraph. I do try to practice NA whenever I can now (lol), but I’m still wondering how to spot that relationship in real time—specifically, how to recognize when a stimulus is assuming total fault rather than partial fault. Is this mostly a matter of doing more reps and asking myself what relationships exist within the paragraph, or should I be paying closer attention to certain parts of the stimulus, like the beginning or the conclusion?
RE "Deconstruct the argument through the causal and moral frameworks." Just wondering which lesson talks about deconstructing an argument through 'moral frameworks'? (last line on page) Or if someone could explain that would be great!
It took me 3 minutes but I believe I understand how to actually answer the question
7
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
54 comments
I didn't want to assume that Acme had switched out the switches before the wreck as it was never said explicitly. I therefore left room for the possibility that it could have been done after the wreck which would mean they didn't know it was a hazard but they do now...ergo why I thought E was wrong and chose A. Can someone explain why that was poor reasoning?
Commenting because, like many others, NA was/is a difficult concept for me. The analysis of the “one vs. multiple responsibilities” perspective wasn’t something I initially considered when reviewing this paragraph. I do try to practice NA whenever I can now (lol), but I’m still wondering how to spot that relationship in real time—specifically, how to recognize when a stimulus is assuming total fault rather than partial fault. Is this mostly a matter of doing more reps and asking myself what relationships exist within the paragraph, or should I be paying closer attention to certain parts of the stimulus, like the beginning or the conclusion?
RE "Deconstruct the argument through the causal and moral frameworks." Just wondering which lesson talks about deconstructing an argument through 'moral frameworks'? (last line on page) Or if someone could explain that would be great!
Anyone else really struggle with getting the questions right on time? I will occasionally get them right but I rarely am within the time frame.
I feel like this explanation is overcomplicating things. Why are we putting our MSS hats on?
#typo Quick typo. The explanation for Answer choice B says "order" when it should be "older
i’m cooked 😀
how’d i get this wrong i feel like an idiot
After that last section I needed some Ws. So far this seems less.. soul-crushing?
i skimmed over the
word not.... :(
Never back down never WHAT????
WE ARE BACK BABY!! bradley cooper voice intensifies
I got it right, but felt not confident. Time to watch the video.
the light at the end of the tunnel
The comments did not disappoint lol I'm not gonna get too excited about getting this right because I know some BS is on the way.
its the calm before flaw questions I just know it
Oh i like these.....Fuhk the NA questions fr
I am so backkkk
it feels like the calm before the storm
This is like a reward after SA and NA
After getting absolutely annihilated during SA and NA i feel like i could cry tears of joy rn
If I ever hear JY's voice in real life, It's gonna sound like he's speaking in slow motion
I chose E and then in the BR I chose B I was torn between those two
i chose e and then in the blind review chose a
It took me 3 minutes but I believe I understand how to actually answer the question