2/5 and then 5/5, im not sure why my first read is so much harder compared to the second. I'm able to narrow it down to two and then I mess up.

4/5, question 1 confused me a bit but after looking at the BR I get it.

I think I can get so caught up trying to make the indicator words work that I end up not looking at the problem as a whole and I get stuff wrong because I'm not reading close enough.

5/5 this group specifically is starting to click

If I am harvesting wheat, I am working hard.

HW -> WH

If I am NOT working hard, I am NOT harvesting wheat.

/WH -> /HW

Ground beef ---> type of meat

Dogs like bones

Tiny dogs living in the city of Rome really like milk bones from Antarctica.

I helped build cradles.

Noun: I

Verb: helped

Predicate: helped build cradles

3/3!

Some people say that candy is good for you. However, candy has high sugar content and causes cavities, both of which are bad for you. Therefore, candy is bad for you.

Will it be important to recognize the difference between a regular premise and a major premise? Or is just seeing the premise and conclusion enough.

All my peers are hard-working.

Alex is my peer.

Alex is hard-working.

Everyone who is hard-working has a good work ethic.

Alex has a good work ethic.

Tiger: Not all fish are able to be eaten raw. For example, the Greenland shark's meat is highly toxic.

Mickey: The way to win an Olympic gold medal is to train or take PED's. John didn't train, so he must have taken PED's.

Mr. Fat Cat: My computer is soaking wet and a cup was left knocked over. The cup is from my roommates set. Therefore, my roommate spilled water and destroyed my computer.

We got this everyone