Subscription pricing
PT Questions
Bailey Luber
- Joined
- Jan 2025
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast. That's Bailey's best advice as to how she got from a 156 to a 175. She used to hate this test and beat herself up for every missed question. After retraining her brain to be kind to herself, read more carefully, and make sound logical decisions, she actually loves the LSAT. I know, I know. What a weirdo. If you want to get scary good at this test, turn complex words into simple ones, and laugh a lot, join her classes! Bailey's favorite part of teaching is the lightbulb moment, when everything clicks and the question that used to be your kryptonite just makes sense. She has lived in Madrid and Buenos Aires, loves a good gap year, and is often hosting classes from a random destination. You’ll find her water coloring, cooking, hiking, giggling, and messing around with her film camera when she isn’t working with students.
Bailey Luber
Saturday, Mar 23 2024
#feedback review 2.4 for conditional inaccuracies???
Bailey Luber
Thursday, Mar 20
PT133 S3 Q11 (Quackery vs Scientifically Valid)
This question is my fav because its SO funny. Read the stimulus. Since when does the LSAT say things like quackery!? I can't stop laughing thinking about my family members who also cannot discriminate quackery from valid info online.
It's a tough question though. Try it and let me know what you guys think!
BTW, practice the negate and destroy test for Necessary Assumptions here: the right answer, if we negate it (aka assume it to NOT be true), should absolutely destroy the link between premise and conclusion in the stimulus!
It can be tough to negate conditional statements. First, make sure you translate each Answer Choice into the Lawgic if A --> B format. Then, the correct way to negate a conditional statement is to say "If A is true, B doesn't have to be true."
#feedback i think there shoiuld be a theory and approach for this question type