I've surprisingly been getting these questions correct, which makes me feel confident, but I really have to work on my time. Most of the time I go 40 seconds to 2 minutes over depending on the question.
Great Explanation. I got this one correct, but it did take me 8mins :/.. I wanted to understand the stimulus thoroughly. How can I get faster? I guess by practicing and drilling more.
after watching the video it makes sense with the answer, but is anyone else having a difficult time inferring "limited number of environmental battles" to "resource constraint?" with time pressure on the actual exam, what is a strategy for inferring these connections when they may not be obvious at first or even a second read? i feel dumb..
I picked my answer and didn't pay attention to any other ones. So when I went to the video, answer F: kill all pandas, made my jaw drop. Was not ready for that 😂
I eliminate C for a different reason. I saw it as comparing to non endemic species. so this choice really said, don't worry if the habitat is threatened, if endemic species we will protect. this is a more attractive answer but still not a good choice
The instructor assumes that "Thus, given that only a limited number of environmental battles can be waged" means a lack of resources. There could be other reasons why there are a limited number of environmental battles. This line of thinking is why I didn't choose B: They didn't discuss resources, and I didn't know I was supposed to assume that.
So i got this question right, I was able to go hunting after the stim, and boom B was right there easy. But then I started to affirm with process of elim, and when I came across D I was I used all my tools so say this is the wrong answer, beyond like this is obviously not the intention of the stim, But like it could be, I went to see how many claims in the stimulus supported the idea that conservationist should just give up. Besides like the obvious intention, the fact that they can only fight a limted amount of battles and even the prior line, about the cause of most modern extinictions also feel like they serve in support. Even the fact that edemic species are vulenerable stands in support. ultimately I settled that this is probly wrong casuse the other choice B is even more supported after spending 3 minutes on this question. I feel like I have failed in some regard, and I would like to know what i am doing wrong in my process
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
64 comments
Phew! Too Easy!
I've surprisingly been getting these questions correct, which makes me feel confident, but I really have to work on my time. Most of the time I go 40 seconds to 2 minutes over depending on the question.
I got it correct, for me I focused on the conclusion and the word waged
Great Explanation. I got this one correct, but it did take me 8mins :/.. I wanted to understand the stimulus thoroughly. How can I get faster? I guess by practicing and drilling more.
Any tips on how to better understand this question, it really confused me.
after watching the video it makes sense with the answer, but is anyone else having a difficult time inferring "limited number of environmental battles" to "resource constraint?" with time pressure on the actual exam, what is a strategy for inferring these connections when they may not be obvious at first or even a second read? i feel dumb..
E was attractive but the use of ONLY was a flag. So, I was confident in my choice of B.
[This comment was deleted.]
Taking your time + Writing it out on scratch paper = Eureka
I picked my answer and didn't pay attention to any other ones. So when I went to the video, answer F: kill all pandas, made my jaw drop. Was not ready for that 😂
I eliminate C for a different reason. I saw it as comparing to non endemic species. so this choice really said, don't worry if the habitat is threatened, if endemic species we will protect. this is a more attractive answer but still not a good choice
#feedback I only have the option to change the playback speed on certain videos!
Not kill all the pandas! 😭
I already understood the idea that LSAT would give us only feasible answer choices, but adding in option F really hammered it home. Thanks, J.Y.
#feedback
Should I be concerned that I didn't notice choice (F) until he read it? My jaw literally dropped.
The obvious answer is to kill all the pandas lmao
Choice A opinion: If one is endemic, they face habitat loss; but not all habitat loss are endemic.
I chose F.. Kinda confused as to how it was wrong?
The instructor assumes that "Thus, given that only a limited number of environmental battles can be waged" means a lack of resources. There could be other reasons why there are a limited number of environmental battles. This line of thinking is why I didn't choose B: They didn't discuss resources, and I didn't know I was supposed to assume that.
Was able to get it right on the first try =)
So i got this question right, I was able to go hunting after the stim, and boom B was right there easy. But then I started to affirm with process of elim, and when I came across D I was I used all my tools so say this is the wrong answer, beyond like this is obviously not the intention of the stim, But like it could be, I went to see how many claims in the stimulus supported the idea that conservationist should just give up. Besides like the obvious intention, the fact that they can only fight a limted amount of battles and even the prior line, about the cause of most modern extinictions also feel like they serve in support. Even the fact that edemic species are vulenerable stands in support. ultimately I settled that this is probly wrong casuse the other choice B is even more supported after spending 3 minutes on this question. I feel like I have failed in some regard, and I would like to know what i am doing wrong in my process
kill all the pandas threw me so off guard
are these sample questions taken from actual LSAT tests?
Genius
I side with answer F