User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Joined
Sep 2025
Subscription
Core
PrepTests ·
PT142.S1.Q22
User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Thursday, Sep 25

I was juggling between C and E when it clicked. If everyone gets an increase in income and people's satisfaction with their income depends on how well it does against their neighbours then there is no change in difference thus no change in satisfaction. If I make $20 more than my neighbour and my satisfaction depends on the fact I make $20 more then it would make no difference to me if we both had our income increased by $20 since the difference in income is the same

PrepTests ·
PT106.S4.P4.Q24
User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Thursday, Sep 25

hmmm. I selected C even though I strongly considered D. The only reason I went against D was the phrase "mutually beneficial". The passage states that the relationship was not to the benefit of hollywood so I assumed there was no mutual benefits. Did I miss something here?

User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Wednesday, Sep 24

One of my main issues I'm finding is that I trip myself up and move away from the correct answer often even when my gut is telling me that it was the correct answer. Something I am trying to do is trust my instincts more and remember that the LSAT isn't about trick questions. The answers are always obvious and so we should trust our process more.

User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Wednesday, Sep 24

I would be interested in this. Mine is likely in February but it could still work

PrepTests ·
PT103.S3.Q22
User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Wednesday, Sep 24

I got the right answer at first but went away from my gut and chose E. The problem I feel is the convoluted way this statement is written. It is so much words and was difficult for me to really break down and understand. Any tips on how I can break things down using this question as an example?

PrepTests ·
PT142.S1.Q23
User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
Saturday, Oct 11

This question pmo. It said that scientists say that the petroleum came not from living material but from carbon deposits. My dumb self forgot to use common sense and simply said that the bacteria being a living organism actually supports the Geologist's argument that the scientists are wrong. I'm guessing using common sense would tell you that petroleum can't come from bacteria so therefor it explains why there are biomarkers on the petroleum

PrepTests ·
PT133.S1.Q24
User Avatar
BaseerJoya1
22 hours ago

never using chatgpt to help me with writing out skeletons again.

Confirm action

Are you sure?