- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
@CRed Same here. Completely failed to understand that the things being compared in each premise were expectations v. reality, and instead fell for the explicit groups being mentioned, but still recognized the commonality in all the premises by reading the answer choices and using process of elimination.
@yesterdayseeker The longer the study session, the more I start thinking and speaking in LSAT LR problems lmao
Tiger: Not every American tennis player is successful on clay. After all, Taylor Fritz has never won a title on the surface.
Disney: US Open ticketholders get access to a special 4th round night session voucher. You can only access the 4R night session voucher via the US Open app if you've watched 10 ads from us open sponsors or signed up for promotional emails from Amex. Tom is a ticketholder with a 4R night session voucher, but he hasn't watched a single add from tournament sponsors. Therefore, Tom must've signed up for promotional emails from Amex.
Mr. Fat Cat: The glass display case for Daryl's extremely rare "Tyler the Great" YuGiOh! card is shattered on the ground of his bedroom. The card is missing. Daryl's friend, Joe, is standing over the shattered display case in his bedroom. Joe's right hand is in his right pocket, and Joe frequently remarked that he loved Daryl's special card and was jealous of him. Therefore, Joe smashed Daryl's display case and stole his YuGiOh! card.
I got this right but my rationale for E was completely different than what was described in the video. I chose E because it seemed like the only question that linked the family size premise to the germs in the conclusion.