This is awesome!! Congratulations on all your hard work! Good luck!!

This is crazy, just watched the Odyssey.

I chose C but I was in-between C and D, the reason that pushed me to C vs D was because I wasn't sure if the AC was referring to a handling fee on their samples or on their regular products. Now coming back to the question it seems silly I overlooked that!

I almost ignored B as the correct AC because I thought that it was confusing sufficient for necessary because it switched the direction from the stimulus. I ended up choosing B through POE but I was not confident in it because of sufficient and necessary lurking in my thoughts lol.

Silly question but can someone better explain how and why the specific form of reasoning method/flaw matters? I'm just not understanding the explanation here.

How does this translate to choosing the correct answer on the test? Like I'm confused on how this will relate at all....

I got this right but I did it differently. Is how I did it correct? Or was I just lucky to end up with the same answer?

Participated in spring cleaning -> Certificate

Clean up participants <-s-> /Active

Conclusion: Certificate <-s-> /Active

When I tried the cafe question on my own I did the lawgic differently but came to the same conclusion... Is how I did it still correct or no?

Cafe <-s-> Decaf BMR

Decaf -> Tea

Conclusion: Cafe <-s-> Decaf -> Tea

I still don't understand the meaning or definitions of sufficient and necessary. Like I can't wrap my head around it.

I understand all these lessons but I'm confused on how they translate to selecting the correct answer on the LSAT. Is this explained in future lessons??

I'm confused on how you know if the premise is valid. Like is it because Garfield has both the C and the M meaning it follows the C - M?

Something that confuses me is how do you know which goes in the bigger circle and which goes in the smaller circle? The diagram really helps me but I'm uncertain about which goes where.

I thought of an assumption being 'Tigers are not suitable to keep as a pet' but then I really thought about it and wouldn't that just be a given based on the premise and conclusion? Like is that really an assumption?