- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
@NoNamed92 As of my current studying, no. I tend to just try to make up time during that passage, as I will almost certainly need it elsewhere. Honestly though, that's not a bad idea. If I am doomed to be more pressed for time during the last passage I complete, it would definitely be better for that passage to be one whose questions can be answered based on inferences rather than more time consuming reading. I'll be taking another full PT in a few days; I'll give that strat a shot if I get a comparative passage.
@WilRothman I think it most likely depends on the test-taker. I am aiming for similar scores to you, with time being a larger barrier to me than full comprehension. Given this, I have found that the split method is better for me. With a full understanding of just one passage, I am often able to answer (with accuracy) a significant majority of questions based on that and my own reasoning. The remaining questions are often answerable by skimming for keywords, meaning I can complete the section without using as much time actually reading.
I think the best option would realistically be an integrated way to look at wrong questions within regular study interfaces. I often completely forget that the WAJ exists tbh