Loving these lessons. Respect 🫡

I feel like I "guessed correctly" on this mainly because it said "accurate rendering of speeches for ONE of the characters" < I logically assumed it had to be a random actor since they could remember their own lines but probably jumble other parts since they did not know the entire play word by word.

please LSAT Gods give me 1-2 star MAX questions in this section on the real LSAT in August 2025.. it has been so intense.. have mercy!

the more times I read these questions the more confusing they get. HALP!

Ok I am starting to get them right.

Pretty much you have to make a "logical assumption" based on the info in the stimulus... all these scientists think mass remains the same because we barely know the univerise anyway so no matter if we discover another 40 billion galaxies its prob like 0.01% of all galaxies lol < I guess this is what helped me.

what makes this hard for me is that I feel im assuming each time I read the answer choices.

Need to lock in.

is this approach actually effective or not? How many people do this and how did it help you?

So far I am having extreme growing pains applying this method to solving LSAT questions ...

Pat sucks for real.

Praying the correlation of less friends and higher LSAT score can apply to me lol

My flawed logic: Monarch butterfly is not a bird. Therefore, it can't migrate south. < WRONG (butterflies might still fly south ... being a bird is not the only way.)

Train your mind to:

- Avoid assumptions.

- Pay attention to clues (Only, All, etc.).

AMAZING how you reviewed that LSAT styled question!

#feedback Please include more examples like this in the future! it helps so much to see how this concept can be applied to answering questions on the LSAT.

MOST means 50% - 100% (majority or could be all)

based on that logic...

MANY could mean 25% - 50% ? < more than "few" , less than "most"?

Context remains king on LSAT questions.