@KenickieHenderson I was completely missing the "take another drill" button, thank you!

I had trouble with A because it seems like a pretty strong statement to say you disagree with the notion that "there are considerably more bird species in the world today than are currently recognized", given the constant discovery of new undiscovered species.

While "undiscovered species" is kind of outside knowledge/unsupported, it also seems like AC A, basically by definition, also extends to mean something along the lines of "there are not considerably more bird species in the world than the ones we aready know about" and that seems like a wild leap from what the passages tell us about the lumpers.

As its written, it seems like this is something we can't infer the lumpers have any opinion. What am I missing?

@Kevin_Lin Amazing!! Thank you :)

@Kevin_Lin I have no issue with it for my initial read, but I don't like how it re-shades everything when I jump back to questions in passages earlier in the section. I like to quickly review all my flagged questions before I submit, and its distracting and takes time to scroll to the "done reading" button in order to unlock my already-answered questions.

@Nia The stimuli says the overdue books must contain at least one adult book. A says that Kessler has adult books out for loan but not that those specific books are overdue

@AlondraSerrano I mean, for example, if I want the default drill to be 26 questions of only lvl 4 and 5

How can you agree with the overall conclusion but disagree on whether it is more expensive? What is the overall conclusion that they agree on?

@SerinJ Thank you!! This is what I was looking for

You can always download your analytics and paste them into a different model

@friendlyfantom this made it click for me. replying so i can return to your comment.

why is this one classified as "math"? am i missing something?

@mikeross-jr My thoughts exactly. I guess "most" is too strong to attribute to the rest of the activists in their community. But still. Annoyed by this answer choice.

@ElizabethKushner or wait might have figured it out. Does "populations" mean we can't interpret it to mean we are comparing one shrimp from Reef A to one shrimp in Reef B and concluding them to be different?

Like are we supposed to be interpreting the study to mean the full populations of Reef A vs Reef B have substantial differences?

C seemed more conclusive than B, but why is B wrong?

Does the stimulus say specifically that the shrimp from different reeds aren't interbreeding, or are we just assuming that to be the case because the shrimp have genetic differences from one another?

I took B to be saying that genetic differences from one reef to another doesn't disprove interbreeding, ie. the shrimp actually could be interbreeding and still have genetic differences?