Self-study
ErinSiodmak
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
LSAT
163
CAS GPA
3.7
1L START YEAR
2027
Applications
Berkeley
In process
Berkeley
In process
Duke
In process
Duke
In process
Georgia
In process
Georgia
In process
Kansas
In process
Kansas
In process
Michigan
In process
Michigan
In process
Minnesota
In process
Minnesota
In process
Northeastern
In process
Northeastern
In process
Northwestern
In process
Northwestern
In process
Notre Dame
In process
Notre Dame
In process
NYU
In process
NYU
In process
Rutgers
In process
Rutgers
In process
Seton Hall
In process
Seton Hall
In process
UCLA
In process
UCLA
In process
UCONN
In process
UCONN
In process
UNC
In process
UNC
In process
UPenn
In process
UPenn
In process
USD
In process
USD
In process
Utah
In process
Utah
In process
UT Austin
In process
UT Austin
In process
UVA
In process
UVA
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
Wake Forest
In process
Wake Forest
In process
WashU
In process
WashU
In process
Wayne State
In process
Wayne State
In process
Wisconsin
In process
Wisconsin
In process
Discussions
ErinSiodmak
Thursday, Apr 2
I'm a little unclear on the explanation for A.
It reads: "If... even one of the coolest brown dwarfs used to be hot enough to destroy lithium, then it would be possible to find one of the coolest brown dwarfs that contained lithium."
Why isn't it, "...contained no lithium"?
The CBDs can't contain no lithium (because then they would be the 'any star' referred to in the stimulus), so that means they must contain lithium right?
On what question types is okay to choose an AC that assumes what has happened in the past will continue to happen in the future? Is it just on a weaken question like this one? It seems like D could be pointed out as a flaw if it was in the stimulus. Not sure why I would assume, given the increasing frequency of El Niño, that past heavy-but-not-sustained rainfall patterns would continue.