@KM i think that's what happened with GRE

i confess, im ESL

the explanation isn't quite on point, is it? Theoretically the concept of "species" is based on the birds currenlty recognized. Just like you cannot claim that there is species called dragon unless you first find a bird and define that it is a dragon. So ofc there aren't more bird species than are recognized.

I dont think its that complicated to solve this problem. At the first glance, there seems to be no issue with the conclusion about the proportion per se. And we all know that LSAC likes to be sneaky on the modifers. So the second glance is to confirm if they swap/change any modifers, which they did. Therefore, we only need to find the similar modifer tricks in the ACs.

the wording of D....

better???

lost from head to toe

big time sink on these parallel questions

these long questions are usually filled with useless crap...

this question is a piece of crap

really need to read every question stem....

by skipping most of the details, and answering questions by searching the keywords, i was able to get -1

omg i thought it means, nothing brings more recognition (to these hypotheses)

LOL why is the EXCEPT in this question so trippy

omg i was thinking 'translation' instead of 'interpretation' in my little brain

@dongjoo2235 yeah, its a weird question

for E, i dont see the link where it indicates higher fee -> fewer patrons

oh... human

@Tumptytumtoes under capitalism, land is private! how could it be under social policy?

very unexpected angle..

wow reading the explanation giave me the epiphany! I will certainly skip this type on exam

wooof, C is such a trap

@ehaupt33 is that what lawyers are supposed to do..?

fk me

what are they trying to achieve by designing question like this