Can someone explain strawman argument. I am so confused

For some reason this one is not clicking

got it with 51 seconds to spare.... im shocked

I hate this

For some reason I still can't understand why A is wrong

Do you guys watch the video and read the text as well?

Im getting strengthen, must be true, most strongly supported, Pseudo Sufficient Assumption and Pseudo Sufficient Assumption stems confused.

Is that a big deal or is it okay since they are kind of the same except the strength or validity of the argument?

Anyone mapping this out? I thought "none" was group 4, shouldn't we use negation rule?

I did that so fast..... HELL YES

Did I miss this lesson, Im so confused

The first time I read this i was so confused but then when I diagrammed during blind review it all made sense. I understood this question as follows:

separated by 1 glass door - merge

sliding doors open - merge

garden well coordinated - merge

There are three ways to merge the space and d just talks about that. Even if one of them does not happen, it can still merge because there are 2 other possibilities.

Not sure if this was the right way to get the right answer.

For question 4, I'm confused about why this is wrong. I negated accept and kept confident positive, which is what I thought Group 3 required.

/Accept - confident - tough decision - responsibility

Im so confused why that is not right

@JasonKeo Same! took it once and did not do good. Took a really really long break and now doing it in november