Here is how I am interpreting it.

(few 50) & (dup 25%) --> funded

contrapose

(few 50) or (dup 25%) --> funded

translating to

(more 50) or (dup less 25%) --> funded

since we know (dup less 25%) it must be (more 50)

But I do have a question regarding the combination of a few 50 and dup 25.

Are these supposed to be read as (few50 AND dup25) as a together conditional instead of as (few 50) & (dup 25%) single conditionals?

In statistical analysis, we would have to find a beta (β) regression to standardize the weighting. I wouldn't be surprised if the formation of LSAC weighting would be similar in this cycle to create a benchmark for future cycles