- Joined
- Jul 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
@Maxdmay All Mavs fans love Jalen Brunson
People who love Jalen Brunson cheered for the Knicks during the playoffs.
All Mavs fans cheered for the Knicks during the playoffs.
If one cheered for the Knicks during the playoffs, they partied hard when they won.
All Mavs fans partied hard when the Knicks won.
@plantpreps Do you think this platform alone is enough? It seems pretty extensive but like I said I am new to all this.
I think it is Disney-Tiger- Cat in that order
Disney- The premises 100 percent guarantee the conclusion because he is a genie plus fast pass holder and there are only 2 ways to achieve it A and B. He did not do A therefore he had to do B.
Tiger- It is strong but it does nut guarantee the conclusion the way the Disney one does. It shows one specific example of how a mammal can be dangerous but the evidence does not show how all mammals are dangerous.
Cat- The strongest evidence would have been seeing the cat tip over the garbage bin but since we don't have that we can only infer it based off the premises given to us. It is still possible the cat did not tip over the bin as maybe it ate something else and was reacting to that and something else tipped over the bin.
@ShaniceManning
P(1)- Most people with blue eyes have a relative with blue eyes
P(2)- Those without blue eyes are far less likely to have a relative with blue eyes
C- Having Blue eyes is largely determined by one's genetics
There is a relationship here as if you have relatives with blue eyes you are more likely to have blue eyes and the opposite is true as if you don't have relatives with blue eyes you are more likely to not have blue eyes.
So the concluding claim being made is one having blue eyes is determined by one's genetic ancestry and the first 2 sentences support that conclusion as it is evidence that strengthens the conclusion.
@NoNamed92 I needed to read this man