habitués apparently means people that are frequenters of a certain place. Such as being a regular at your local cafe. And it is pronounced Hah bih choo A

anyone from the future have any recommendations on which one is more useful?

@Isabella! I agree. I understood it as an example of how a previous misinterpretation was rectified with the courts new understanding.

@kyuthetenor Yeah I agree it seems like a circular reasoning flaw from LR

@RealAlHorford I feel like they're giving an opinion about morality rather than any side of the debate

Before going to the answer choices, I thought an important characteristic of the custom-made illustrations is that they only include relevant details that is necessary for the audience. So, would an answer choice that described that be correct? For example an earnings report shown to shareholders of a company that intentionally sacrifices some detail about employment data or something like that?

wainwater wunoff

HOLY AIRBALL

I've struggled in this section to independently form the "bridge" that we're supposed to be looking out for. As a result, I have a difficult time differentiating the wrong ACs from the correct one. Is the bridge simply supposed to be premise -> conclusion? #help #pls

I keep going back to the cat and mammal examples.

1. ex. Tom is not a mammal. We know for sure then that Tom is not a cat because being a mammal is 100% required for being a cat.

2. ex. Tom is a cat. We know for sure that Tom is also a mammal because being a cat is sufficient enough info to know Tom is 100% a mammal.

3. ex. Tom is a mammal. Well that doesnt guarantee anything because Tom could still be a human or dog or whatever other mammal.

4. ex. Tom is not a cat. Again, doesnt guarantee anything cause Tom could still be another type of mammal.