Current events —- this is why that CEO who was killed is kinda EERIE for me because isn’t he just doing his fiduciary obligation to the actual owners of United Healthcare. I can’t imagine anyone thinking he made decisions that are to HIS BENEFIT.
This sounds to me as though the author takes a position by describing where corporate responsibility actually lies. Though, I guess what makes this context as opposed to an argument is that the author is not exactly describing WHERE corporations HAVE a responsibility?
Corporations ARE persons. How to deal with statements that are factually wrong -do we accept what is in the passage as somebody's incorrect opinion, or accept the wrong thing as if it were true...what to do? Knowing corporations are persons, how do I understand the text after that incorrect statement?
Any tips for getting better at low-res summaries? Mine are always consistent with what they give, but mine are typically slightly more detailed or not so simplified. Granted, my recall has been good using my version, so maybe it isn't something I need to change, but I know every second counts.
This is a little off topic but does anyone have any suggestions on where I can get exposed to passages like these on a daily basis? I need to get used to reading more complex passages/ writings like the ones we see on RC.
I'm a little confused in how you can see the change in perspective from the first paragraph to the second. After watching the explanation I just know that I would still look at that first sentence of the second paragraph and associate it with what the economists were saying before the paragraph break.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
25 comments
Current events —- this is why that CEO who was killed is kinda EERIE for me because isn’t he just doing his fiduciary obligation to the actual owners of United Healthcare. I can’t imagine anyone thinking he made decisions that are to HIS BENEFIT.
having trouble coming up with good low-res summaries. Any tips?
This sounds to me as though the author takes a position by describing where corporate responsibility actually lies. Though, I guess what makes this context as opposed to an argument is that the author is not exactly describing WHERE corporations HAVE a responsibility?
i feel like this one DOES kinda make stand with author POV, because of the use of "we"
Corporations ARE persons. How to deal with statements that are factually wrong -do we accept what is in the passage as somebody's incorrect opinion, or accept the wrong thing as if it were true...what to do? Knowing corporations are persons, how do I understand the text after that incorrect statement?
Any tips for getting better at low-res summaries? Mine are always consistent with what they give, but mine are typically slightly more detailed or not so simplified. Granted, my recall has been good using my version, so maybe it isn't something I need to change, but I know every second counts.
Heh, I love Kevin's humor
This is a little off topic but does anyone have any suggestions on where I can get exposed to passages like these on a daily basis? I need to get used to reading more complex passages/ writings like the ones we see on RC.
its crazy how accurately this passage aligns with the Luigi mangiano vs health care coe
Actually pretty glad I took a corporate law class as an elective last semester so I could understand this better
The last part about "fiduciary obligation" is just saying that the CEO has an obligation to act in the best interests of the owners of the company.
What is my low-res summary is a few sentences, or a model. Will this trip me up on the test?
Reading this passage with news about the united Healthcare CEO makes this more interesting to read about
I'm a little confused in how you can see the change in perspective from the first paragraph to the second. After watching the explanation I just know that I would still look at that first sentence of the second paragraph and associate it with what the economists were saying before the paragraph break.
#help
Typo in heading of this lesson.
2