ugh i knew my gut feeling was wrong so when I did the blind review - i just had to re-read and re-read that sentence. At least I got it in the blind review.

It took me 3 mins to think it through, but i got it. In this economy, i'll take every win i can get

4/5 on normal. Feels bad that I got the only lvl 5 question wrong. Will have to keep practicing

i didn't even read the answer choice , i just immediately looked for the choice that highlighted

A has X, B has Y, X>Y, therefore A is [insert conclusion]

Finally after getting the last two wrong, i finally got the lvl 5 difficulty one right

Literally shouted in glee

I understood the flaw, but i couldn't find what i was thinking in the answer choices T.T

Idk why i couldn't understand answer choice A. sigh

I have the same question as some others had for Q28.

I thought that the passage was addressing the problems about what the authors proposed. Key words after the sentence starting on line 32 include "But" and "Furthermore" which seem to address the lack of consideration of the "Expert's" proposal.

As the question asks which statement can be attributed to the experts, I think we're owed a better explanation of how the sentence starting on line 48, which was used to justify the (correct) answer choice A, applies to a view attributed to the "expert"

The explanation as we have now, about how the "law as it exists" has a "carve out" for academics seems irrelevant, when we can't know from the text that the experts believed this!

ohhh i get it,

basically in layman's terms, D is right because the prompt is discussing the likeliness of dramatic findings, and the answer choice explains that flaw being that the contention doesn't address the possibility of there being MORE small studies than are large ones.

In a universe where the following could be ture, as explained, the fact that there are THATT many small studies would be enough to refute the fact that smaller studies are MORE LIKELY to find dramatic findings, due to the SHEER QUANTITY of small studies, a universe where the smaller studies ends up ACTUALLY being MORE DRAMATIC is UNLIKELY, whereas large studies may be 80 % dramatic 20% not dramatic studies is VERY LIKELY

Can someone confirm this if i understand

I was thinking about it right, but misrepresented my thoughts in the answer choice. damn

so if i understand this correctly…

A is saying that the proportion of thieves holding onto the cars has increased. This increase means that due to the fact that the quantity of thieves with stolen cars is higher than before, the likelihood of their conviction is higher overall?

#help

oh no, this was bad- i need to read the question more throughly. Eyes simply skipped over “reject”, which completely throws u off. Rookie mistake

I got it right, but i had to POE until the last two between A and B. I got lucky, i totally didn’t analyze the “most” vs “more” point.

smh get the level 3 difficulty wrong but the level 5 one right... how do i even.. lmao

win is a win

I hate that i was on the right track, but i just couldn't make that last bit of connection... godammit

tsk. I can't help but roll my eyes a little bit on the fact that it's A because it says it's legally "binding" in the text.

I would have anticipated something in regards to the fact that expands on the characteristic quality of the video recording itself, besides that it's legally binding, which seems redundant to the question. Like how it's easy to store/ manage etc.

But I get it, just frustrated.