- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I have the same question as some others had for Q28.
I thought that the passage was addressing the problems about what the authors proposed. Key words after the sentence starting on line 32 include "But" and "Furthermore" which seem to address the lack of consideration of the "Expert's" proposal.
As the question asks which statement can be attributed to the experts, I think we're owed a better explanation of how the sentence starting on line 48, which was used to justify the (correct) answer choice A, applies to a view attributed to the "expert"
The explanation as we have now, about how the "law as it exists" has a "carve out" for academics seems irrelevant, when we can't know from the text that the experts believed this!
tsk. I can't help but roll my eyes a little bit on the fact that it's A because it says it's legally "binding" in the text.
I would have anticipated something in regards to the fact that expands on the characteristic quality of the video recording itself, besides that it's legally binding, which seems redundant to the question. Like how it's easy to store/ manage etc.
But I get it, just frustrated.
ugh i knew my gut feeling was wrong so when I did the blind review - i just had to re-read and re-read that sentence. At least I got it in the blind review.
I switched my answers last second between D to C.
i was able to recognize that it was whole to part via the following thought process:
"the whole collection is expensive" -> collector assume the individual paints are expensive
"the whole paragraph is long" -> we assume incorrectly that the individual sentences are long.
As for D, we are saying that "individual members are old" -> we assume incorreclty that whole company is old. BUT this is wrong, since we're looking at a part(company members) to company.
hence, C
i didn't even read the answer choice , i just immediately looked for the choice that highlighted
A has X, B has Y, X>Y, therefore A is [insert conclusion]
this is some conspiracy level stuff... Is there any way we can check the percentage of previous parallel reasoning questions have been answer choice "E" lol
I understood the flaw, but i couldn't find what i was thinking in the answer choices T.T
Idk why i couldn't understand answer choice A. sigh
ohhh i get it,
basically in layman's terms, D is right because the prompt is discussing the likeliness of dramatic findings, and the answer choice explains that flaw being that the contention doesn't address the possibility of there being MORE small studies than are large ones.
In a universe where the following could be ture, as explained, the fact that there are THATT many small studies would be enough to refute the fact that smaller studies are MORE LIKELY to find dramatic findings, due to the SHEER QUANTITY of small studies, a universe where the smaller studies ends up ACTUALLY being MORE DRAMATIC is UNLIKELY, whereas large studies may be 80 % dramatic 20% not dramatic studies is VERY LIKELY
Can someone confirm this if i understand
I was thinking about it right, but misrepresented my thoughts in the answer choice. damn
It took me 3 mins to think it through, but i got it. In this economy, i'll take every win i can get
4/5 on normal. Feels bad that I got the only lvl 5 question wrong. Will have to keep practicing
smh get the level 3 difficulty wrong but the level 5 one right... how do i even.. lmao
win is a win
Finally after getting the last two wrong, i finally got the lvl 5 difficulty one right
Literally shouted in glee
Oh man i was honestly embarrassed i didn’t know either- glad I wasn’t alone
so if i understand this correctly…
A is saying that the proportion of thieves holding onto the cars has increased. This increase means that due to the fact that the quantity of thieves with stolen cars is higher than before, the likelihood of their conviction is higher overall?
#help
oh no, this was bad- i need to read the question more throughly. Eyes simply skipped over “reject”, which completely throws u off. Rookie mistake
I got it right, but i had to POE until the last two between A and B. I got lucky, i totally didn’t analyze the “most” vs “more” point.
I hate that i was on the right track, but i just couldn't make that last bit of connection... godammit