I thought that paragraph 4 was presenting the solutions to the issue as the court ended up ruling in favour of Boyd? Meaning that it is the main point of the passage? #help #feedback
@nnkNewYork I think this could be a sub-conclusion of the Court's opinion, but not necessarily the passage's main point. The passage as a whole is more focused on the problems arising from inconsistent definitions of 'traditional,' rather than just addressing the issues with that particular definition of 'traditional.'
9 comments
I like this passage. It makes intuitive sense to me, which is definitely not a given, lol.
This was so much better than the last passage
I thought that paragraph 4 was presenting the solutions to the issue as the court ended up ruling in favour of Boyd? Meaning that it is the main point of the passage? #help #feedback
@Isabella! I agree. I understood it as an example of how a previous misinterpretation was rectified with the courts new understanding.
Kevin is the best
gonna look into otter career paths
Would it also be acceptable to isolate the sentence beginning with "it defies common sense" as Main Point-y? Felt very opinionated to me
@nnkNewYork I think this could be a sub-conclusion of the Court's opinion, but not necessarily the passage's main point. The passage as a whole is more focused on the problems arising from inconsistent definitions of 'traditional,' rather than just addressing the issues with that particular definition of 'traditional.'
@nnkNewYork agreed... felt very much like the authors opinon...