I thought that paragraph 4 was presenting the solutions to the issue as the court ended up ruling in favour of Boyd? Meaning that it is the main point of the passage? #help #feedback
@nnkNewYork I think this could be a sub-conclusion of the Court's opinion, but not necessarily the passage's main point. The passage as a whole is more focused on the problems arising from inconsistent definitions of 'traditional,' rather than just addressing the issues with that particular definition of 'traditional.'
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
5 comments
I thought that paragraph 4 was presenting the solutions to the issue as the court ended up ruling in favour of Boyd? Meaning that it is the main point of the passage? #help #feedback
Would it also be acceptable to isolate the sentence beginning with "it defies common sense" as Main Point-y? Felt very opinionated to me
@nnkNewYork I think this could be a sub-conclusion of the Court's opinion, but not necessarily the passage's main point. The passage as a whole is more focused on the problems arising from inconsistent definitions of 'traditional,' rather than just addressing the issues with that particular definition of 'traditional.'
@nnkNewYork agreed... felt very much like the authors opinon...
I like this passage. It makes intuitive sense to me, which is definitely not a given, lol.