- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
Five point score improvement. May take again because why not but in disbelief at my score. Which is basically now way beyond the 75th at any school I'd be interested in. Didn't even feel too hot coming out of the test.
For the record, I hated diagramming and conditional logic the entire time but still went way beyond my expectations. We are all gonna make it.
@HenryLehmann Someone I know who took the LSAT said you earn doing it fast and intuitively by lots of diagramming practice which stuck with me.
I'm struggling with number four a bit - if it's 2 groups 200 randomly selected subjects for both trials the correct answer seems like a large interpretive overreach for me.
Kicking as much universal/not contested info to the domain to keep the diagramming simple helps me a lot.
That monster question made my brain feel like it was dying but I ended up with /physically dangerous and inspires revulsion -> horrific -> threatening which I don't think it was really right but got me there.
Was I wrong to go SAS-> /P and /A-> SAS and then combine to /A-> SAS -> /P? I noticed it didn't say she actually delivered the speech and got it right but felt I was following the group three unless rules here.
Subset membership is enough for superset membership but not required. Superset membership is required for subset membership, but not enough.
@AR91 Easier way for me to ask does something else support this? If so I usually find it's an intermediate conclusion and works pretty well so far.
Echo what everyone else is saying about taking my time and making sure I understood what each part of the argument was doing. I've also done a fair amount of drills and did the free lawhub stuff so I often feel like I'm in a stage where I can overthink and psych myself out of an easy answer - but 3/3!
This is fantastic! Thanks a lot.