- Joined
- 4 days ago
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
@daysdreaming I also thought tigers was weakest because it has less claims/evidence that support the conclusion.
@DortheaElridge I wouldn't rely on that as a rule. I think it is best to think of it as "premises are the claims offered as reasons and conclusions are the claims being supported". For example, John is a bachelor therefore, John is unmarried. These claims both lack detail.
@themoodyactivist Here is another example to think about: Maria probably studied hard for the exam, since she got the highest score in the class. Test the first direction.... In a world where Maria got the highest score on the exam. Does it make it more likely that Maria studied hard for the exam? Yes. Getting the highest score is evidence that she likely studied hard. But then try reversing it in the other direction. In a world where Maria studied hard for the exam, does it make it more likely that she got the highest score on the exam? No. She could have studied hard but still did poorly or not as good as someone else. Therefore, the premise is: Maria got the highest score in the class and the conclusion is: Maria probably studied hard. The fact Maria got the highest score in the class is evidence (support) that she studied hard.
To help anyone's confusion, this passage is just explaining how to identify a premise and conclusion. And the way to figure this out is to ask yourself "If claim A were true, would it make claim B more likely to be true?" If the answer is yes, then A is supporting B. A= Premise, B= Conclusion
@LastLivingLily0 I thought this too. Then I realized in the conclusion was the same term in the premise ("The true rate of earnings") and realized there was a relationship between these claims. I think this is basically what you just said in your comment, just rewording into my "own" words.