- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
BR:
So I read this wrong initially. I missed the wording "such nations" ; thus making AC E really kind of irrelevant. AC C and D really were not relevant and AC A was weak.
Leaving AC B; but also by reason it makes sense. If they are not in danger of developing that disease then why take it?
Okay!!!!!!!! So multiple notes here.
When you read X always has Y= this does not equate to Y always having X. Remember this!!! This is one of your main flaws here.
"A necessary condition for fuzzy seeds is long stems. But just because you have long stems, does not automatically mean you have fuzzy seeds. Take this for example, A necessary condition of a fire is heat. But just because you fulfill the necessary condition of having heat, does that automatically mean you have a fire? No! You could just have a sunny day." @matrealjohnson18
Another major reading flaw is that you read Fuzzy seeds always have long stems and long stems never have white flowers. BUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It actually reads, Fuzzy seeds always have longs stems BUT (still talking about fuzzy seeds) NEVER have white flowers.
Once I charted the above as opposed to what my charting was before- it was actually very easy to get to AC C.
I knew that the AC would have white flowers because curled leaves ALWAYS have white flowers. But that would be the end of the chart UNLESS you remember, fuzzy seeds NEVER have white flowers- THUS!!!!!! this does not have fuzzy seeds.
COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In preparing for law school applications; apart from the below, is there any other pieces of information/paperwork to prepare?
LSAC Score and Writing Exam
Referral Letters
Personal Statement
Resume
School Transcript
How is the PS to be written and read? Is it a hook and description form of paper or is it a "Hi, name is so and so...". Are we wanting to intentionally grab the readers interest using literary devices or be as straightforward as possible (like a resume)?
I might be missing this but is there a way to have a journal tab/section where we can easily scroll down our notes? Perhaps even convert to PDF for a in depth study of our patterns.
This one is difficult, im having difficulty understanding why AC E is relevant. The same irrelevancy that AC A B and C have should apply to AC E. I can see how E could be right but I ruled out AC A, C and D, simply because we were not given insight on that control group. But how is AC E an appropriate assumption?? We dont know how the control group would have responded given that same question???
BR: I initially chose AC B as this was discrediting the experiment but AC C tackles the actual main argument: the focus is not just the Bobo Doll but the actual violence.
Quick question: on the actual test- is there a time/clock on the top right for all sections??
Also, side question. If you have to use the bathroom what happens....?
@JacobBaska Okay! So lets say we lived with our parents ( just an example!)- we could subtract the cost of living to the total 3 year cost ?
The biggest hack I have is noting the severity/gravity of how the words are being used. Is it too intense? Is it too weak? Is it too strong? Is the answer appropriately "most" when the stimulus says all? It is not always black and white but something I regularly check for.
When clicking on a school, would someone clarify the tuition and costs to me?
Is the Cost of living (off campus) the estimation of only the cost-of-living expenses (rent, groceries, etc) apart from the tuition?
And the actual Total cost is the cost of 1 year or semester? (again, apart from the cost of living).
We should be looking at the total cost for a year's tuition and of course the 3 years for the entirety of the full-time completion. Am I understanding this correctly?
And for the scholarship predictor- this is only for one year correct?
Yes!!!!!! 7Sage should do a LSAT Vocab game!!! Utilizing the less common, rare or confusing terms and doing a form of mix and match perhaps? Not sure but that would be super useful!!!!!!
Okay okay- I think I misunderstood the grammar. The double negatives may have gotten me here. The stimulus is saying that IF it fits in the pot, it is miniature. AC B said that it correctly labels any trees as miniature if it does NOT fit in a tub- thus anti-supported.
AC E does say what the grammar hints at.
Hi! Could we get the new lsac format on BR as well? That way we can remain consistent in our highlighting patterns and also get more practice with it?
I know this may not be a universally shared interest but just an idea!



BR:
So I read this wrong initially. I missed the wording "such nations" ; thus making AC E really kind of irrelevant. AC C and D really were not relevant and AC A was weak.
Leaving AC B; but also by reason it makes sense. If they are not in danger of developing that disease then why take it?