- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
I might be missing this but is there a way to have a journal tab/section where we can easily scroll down our notes? Perhaps even convert to PDF for a in depth study of our patterns.
Good luck everyone tomorrow and the following days!
Get rest, remember to breathe and celebrate!!!
BR: I initially chose AC B as this was discrediting the experiment but AC C tackles the actual main argument: the focus is not just the Bobo Doll but the actual violence.
Quick question: on the actual test- is there a time/clock on the top right for all sections??
Also, side question. If you have to use the bathroom what happens....?
@JacobBaska Okay! So lets say we lived with our parents ( just an example!)- we could subtract the cost of living to the total 3 year cost ?
The biggest hack I have is noting the severity/gravity of how the words are being used. Is it too intense? Is it too weak? Is it too strong? Is the answer appropriately "most" when the stimulus says all? It is not always black and white but something I regularly check for.
When clicking on a school, would someone clarify the tuition and costs to me?
Is the Cost of living (off campus) the estimation of only the cost-of-living expenses (rent, groceries, etc) apart from the tuition?
And the actual Total cost is the cost of 1 year or semester? (again, apart from the cost of living).
We should be looking at the total cost for a year's tuition and of course the 3 years for the entirety of the full-time completion. Am I understanding this correctly?
And for the scholarship predictor- this is only for one year correct?
Yes!!!!!! 7Sage should do a LSAT Vocab game!!! Utilizing the less common, rare or confusing terms and doing a form of mix and match perhaps? Not sure but that would be super useful!!!!!!
Okay okay- I think I misunderstood the grammar. The double negatives may have gotten me here. The stimulus is saying that IF it fits in the pot, it is miniature. AC B said that it correctly labels any trees as miniature if it does NOT fit in a tub- thus anti-supported.
AC E does say what the grammar hints at.
Hi, I am a little confused. Thought the LSAT testing would all open at the same time but this open in sections? I am PDT
Hi! Could we get the new lsac format on BR as well? That way we can remain consistent in our highlighting patterns and also get more practice with it?
I know this may not be a universally shared interest but just an idea!
BR: So we are looking for an answer that is SUPPORTED by the stimulus. Not that SUPPORTS the stimulus. I am going to assume that that is why AC B and AC C is wrong.
AC E Achieves this.
@Malili I agree- I actually understand why AC A is strong but AC C seems to be just as strong- but to be discounted as irrelevant is very challenging.
I have been studying for the past 3-4 months but feel as if nothing is breaking through. When I drill, I am usually able to understand all my mistakes after review and am constantly note taking. But when I am doing PTs or longer drills- it feels like nothing is breaking through. I FEEL like I know so much more but my actual performance is showing other wise.
My PTs have been 145, 153, 152, 160 (which really encouraged me), 152 and 153.
I have not done the core curriculum or watched videos. I feel as if I am a fail, examine and learn, type of learner, but will of course consider this. Does anyone have any suggestions or any notes? I am so convinced I understand the logic and tricks soooo much more- but in practice it shows otherwise. I KNOW we can all do this, but super disheartened.
Hi, could we have a feature that shows us which of the 4 sections were experimental? Also, not sure if this had been addressed- but is there plans to update the BR up to the new law hub appearance?
I understood it as follows: The stimulus is saying that turtles live and breed in distinct groups- therefore being distinct. It introduces evidence. AC D is saying that not only was the BAJA turtles 95% similar to the pacific loggerheads- but the Atlantic ones as well. THEREFORE, not being distinct.
Argument was misunderstood.
AC D "it’s likely that the antibiotics cause antibiotic resistance in the bacteria, not the heavy-metal exposure."
^ We are wanting to prove that "the bacteria's exposure to the heavy metals in the sewage sludge has somehow promoted their resistance to antibiotics."!!!!!!!!!
AC B shows this!!!!!!
Quick question: are LOR required to be connected to your undergrad instructors? I am able to get LOR, but from attorneys and managing partners in my Law Firm. If I need to get these from my previous instructors however, this may prove slightly challenging.
This one is difficult, im having difficulty understanding why AC E is relevant. The same irrelevancy that AC A B and C have should apply to AC E. I can see how E could be right but I ruled out AC A, C and D, simply because we were not given insight on that control group. But how is AC E an appropriate assumption?? We dont know how the control group would have responded given that same question???