#help

For question #3 I am confused on where the negation came from in the video explanation. In the answer from the text there is no negation and I got that correct. Just not understanding why we would negate the second clause.

I think I am just a little confused by #3 and #6 because we talked about in the video that if there were "connecting words" then it would be argument. But what if there are no connecting/indicating words to show that it would be a premise/conclusion. Are we just supposed to be on the lookout for indicator words to ensure that it is an argument.