I have found many of these questions to be much easier when you don’t read some of these incredibly confusing explanations in the lessons prior to the question. The lessons truly just make you doubt yourself and make you over think many of the questions. Additionally, I only read the explanation as to which answer is correct and why it is correct so that way I only take away what I’m supposed to be looking for in each question. There is no reason a 14 minute video is necessary to explain why an answer is correct. Less is more

The explanation as to why E is the answer does not make sense. Much less competitors still means there could be a number of competitors that leads to the positive impact for the consumer in regard to privatization. I’m not sure how that weakens the argument at all. While I understand that B does not directly address the positive impact on the consumer, it still is the only answer that provides any reason why the privatization would potentially have a negative impact on the consumer. Even if just 2 consumers become unemployed as a result, that could easily be seen as a negative. E just tells me that the positive impact may not be as great as the telecommunications but does not give me any indication that there would be no positive impact on the consumer.

“Where is she!?” *proceeded to punch the joker in the face numerous times

Huh?

This has me completely confused. I feel like the teacher is contradicting previous lessons