im only able to make the symbols make sense to the context of the question but im confused on what im supposed to be doing with the chain, i feel like the examples and ''lawgic'' dont make sense because its not specific to what real lsat questions will be asking, can someone explain why use lawgic if I dont even know what a real lsat question could be asking

Why does he over explain it, jt makes so much more confusing

1/5 im cooked

he over simplified question 4 fs

are concessions like rebuttals in a way

is it bad I am slightly studying for a diagnostic test