Can we get some better reasonings on why an NA question type answer is right, instead of of “it’s right because it it weren’t true…”.

@epayne17 If you got it wrong just say that! 😂 get your smarty up not your dummy up

This time is perfect! I work a full time during the day. This is the exact time that I put aside to study for LSAT each weekday.

@tar You have to take notes on it, seriously. Would not have gotten this correct if it weren't for my notes that I taken months ago. And I am so grateful I did.

I chose A assuming that cumbersome meant 'necessary' or beneficial.

@HilarySackor Welcome to the LSAT.

@Apieceofstring 'We does mean humans. Which is how and why A was the correct answer choice. E does not mention humans whatsoever.

@JackFoley Not every question is as simple as this one.

@KhaleemahRashid I wanna know as well. I could do virtually as I live in South Florida.

What I took from this question: Process of Elimination is your best friend!

@rosadoj2193 Think of it this way: In MC questions, the 'wrong' answer like likely take the conclusion too far.

Got the cheet sheets printed, im ready to goooo and lock in for LR and RC!

Guys, take notes from the last 4 videos on negations!!!!! Life changer I am getting 5/5

I believe that I mainly gotten confused with this question due to me interpreting "Further increases will be extremely difficult:....." as the possibility of there being a further increase, is difficult. Which in the end would make the conclusion "... a severe worldwide grain shortage is likely." to infact, not be likely.

@pierinachica1 Think of it this way: the conclusion is whatever receives the MOST support. The last two sentences provided support on why ".. this would be a blunder." as as opposed to supporting why "students will soon be able to freely access their academic records.