I may have misread the answer choice D.

"Some sciences can yield mathematically precise results that are not inherently suspect."

means "Some science claim very precise numbers that are not suspicious"

I thought that the question was asking for what Sandra would disagree and what Taylor would agree.

But wouldn't Taylor disagree to this, because he thinks that it is suspect?

I chose AC D and AC B was one of the first ACs that I crossed out and did not like but now I see it.

Like, I wouldn't take my precious Apple MacBook Air to this sketchy repair shop in down the block of my neighborhood, I would take it to Apple Store.

The repair shop then would have other computer brands laptops brought to them, but that does not mean those other brands are worse than apple MacBook.

As long as we can weaken the argument by attacking the assumption of this sketchy tally from the sketchy repair shop down the block, the job is done.

Really thankful that you are making these sentences more understandable by interchanging them in more simple terms, otherwise I would have lost focus..

I was very tempted by answer choice A, but then I thought, all these statements about what lawyers should/not do to make the "steal thunder" strategy effective seemed to be merely Author's points.

The lawyers mentioned in the passage only believe that the "steal thunder" strategy is effective, and we were not given with the information about how the lawyers do indeed make the strategy effective in actual world or what the lawyers think of the how.

We only learnt from the passage that the lawyers should consider positively frame the information and what not.

In the last paragraph, because the latter half didn't mention about Garber, I somehow thought that it was subtly introducing Author's view.

These past 3 questions have been very challenging to me... I can tell that the issue is part-to-whole when I read the passage, but I just cannot find the right answer choice that indicates that issue.

What is this??? This question was not made to test our critical/logical skills, it was made to challenge our strength of mentality

I chose C because I thought it attacks the premise as false, but the premise actually only says that i“can” reduce the vitamin content, it doesn’t say that it actually does

I will just remind myself during the actual test that a lot of questions past #20 would be tricking us or baiting us in a very nasty way.

I'm taking too much time understanding and mapping out the relations. The target time is about 1:30, but I have been taking 2-3mins on these questions...

Before I watched this explanation, I wanted to see how Chat GPT would explain this, and it chose E as the answer, which I chose at first under timed condition.

I think I misread "significantly reduces" as just "reduces"

I am certain that I will never get these kind of questions correct under time pressure, but I just pray that practice will get me to that level of mastery