- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
They both say that a good art critic needs to either dispense bias or not have any to begin with, due to disinterest. Sh*t question.
@wm Yeah I knew there was an implication and just picked the first one I saw that mentioned "imply." Foolish.
7Sage is a great training platform, but after months of studying, I only got one freaking point higher (157 -> 158). Very frustrated. Oh well, back to it.
@aprilchukwueke468 "IF a snowflake is in a warm place AND it is not protected by insulation, THEN snowflake will melt." ... Now try "IF a garment is fashionable AND not too expensive, THEN I will buy it." It's the same pattern.
D. "... liable for any damage generated by that product's use."
The use does not seem to generate the damage to the permafrost. There are several assumptions that have to be made here. Maybe the earth's core is heating up too. Who knows. Bad answer choices.
I did it by seeing "all" then "some" then "some" in the stim. C is the only one that fits. Quick trick that probably doesn't always work. But I'd lose 5 friggin minutes at least doing this one properly.
For B as well, there isn't really a formal relationship defined in the stimulus with the word "plodding". Plodding = Easier is an assumption on behalf of the test taker.
That first sentence messed me up. I had "threatening -> Horrific". I keep getting messed up by putting stuff on the wrong side of the arrows. Anyone have any tips for that?
Anyone else exclude D because the stim is specifically mentioning "atmosphere" bubbles and D is talking about the sea-floor? Thought that would be an improper sampling of evidence to prove claims about atmospheric conditions.
"How is it that Mr. Tannisch could have had a guest who apparently left no fingerprints in his house?" -- Bruh I'm thinking like a 175 over here getting a 145 ;(
@hassan01 It's the subset -> superset. A Jedi is a category of creatures that use the force. There are other things that can use the force too though, Sith, Jarjar binks (allegedly), etc.
If you're testing well and your confidence is up, that's a pretty good place to be
@arosegarcia I think we probably had the same problem. I first read it as "Any good show must have Insp Mus Performance AND Sophisticated Listeners." I thought there was a dual requirement instead of just a straight chain. Stupid DUMB question for total MONGS.
@ANNASHAHVERDYAN The conclusion has to do specifically with it being cost-effective. Since answer E is primarily dealing with Cost, this should be one of the first to look at. If pumping is one of the largest costs, than much of the cost is accounted for if that statement is true, meaning we don't likely have to worry about dark-figure costs that we are not aware of due to not being addressed. And it already says in the stimmy that the pumping of seawater is much cheaper than pumping freshwater.
"Available to the general public" - apparently consumers buy a lot of pesticide?
In B, "that test results obtained from laboratory rats" and "that THESE test results obtained from laboratory rats" are very different ideas.
@Matty_Ice Nevermind, I was wrong. Tania says that (paraphrase) ordinary criticism involves not being interested. But art is NOT like this. Art is a passion and good criticism cannot be separated from an emotion (interest/bias)." So she's saying good criticism of art can be biased -- or is even LIKELY to be. (But that's ok, art criticism is unique). Monique says "best art critics shed all their bias." Implied is that the better you are as a critic, the less bias you have." ... But "good" is not "best", so I'd expect there to be a little bias hanging around, so they both seem like they admit that good criticism will have bias... So I hate this question and it's crap.