- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
@AlinorSmith
I wrote the lawgic for this part as (following group 3 unless indicator, negate the "will not increase" and make sufficent):
Increase Profits -> Traffic Decreases
The explanation video says the same thing. I believe you are correct it is necessary.
3/3, however I took 23 minutes on the first question due to my brain borking necessary/sufficient on even the first sentence.
What helped me was to rethink about the first sentence:
" To belong in the set A, a thing must be in set B"
Example: "To belong in the state of Texas, a thing must be in the USA"
So, Horrific is the sufficient condition and threatening the necessary.
Take this with a grain of salt, I am terrible at this.
Hi everyone, I'm Joey. I'm in the Portland Metro (OR) and plan on taking the test this summer. Please hit me up if you want to connect about the LSAT and go through this feat together :)
Why do I get crushed by some 2star difficult questions but then get this one (but not all 5star!) with more or less ease. Really messing with me cri.