McSec

Joined: Dec 2025
Subscription: Core

Admissions profile

LSAT

Not provided Goal score: 165

CAS GPA

2.67

1L START YEAR

2027

Applications

Baylor

In process

Colorado - Boulder

In process

Denver

In process

Kansas

In process

LSU

In process

Oklahoma

In process

Oklahoma City

In process

Southern Methodist

In process

South Texas

In process

Texas Tech

In process

Tulsa

In process

UNM

In process

Discussions

Admissions · "Chopped and Unc"- 2.6/165 (PT)

McSec

Yesterday

@lawdaddy420 true

Admissions · "Chopped and Unc"- 2.6/165 (PT)

McSec

Yesterday

@AngelEyes

Admissions

•

yesterday

McSec

😫 Dismay

"Chopped and Unc"- 2.6/165 (PT)

Pretty non-traditional student but I just feel very intimidated looking at all of the admissions communities (reddit, tiktok, here) with people posting doom and gloom about their 3.7s and 170+s.

I graduated from the US Military Academy (West Point) back in 2020 and have spent the past 6 years and change in the army including a combat deployment to Iraq. I'm really hoping that this non-traditional experience will help me out and get me into some solid schools.

I've been really trying to focus on what I can control, my personal essay, my resume, etc. I've finished my personal statement (I think its lowkey a banger but it might just be your run-of-the-mill army guy essay ngl). Currently looking at applying to schools in the 40-100+ ranking with my absolute number 1 being Oklahoma.

Am I cooked?

General · AI coach

McSec

Wednesday, May 27

Id like to be added too

Lessons · You Try - Unauthorized Access of Computer Files (PSAa)

McSec

Monday, Feb 9

Rule 1: justified only if the computer is typically used in the operation of a business.

Now consider two conclusions: access is justified versus access if not justified. Which conclusion is reachable via the first rule? Access is not justified. That is a reachable conclusion. To reach it, we just need to trigger the rule contrapositively. In other words, we need a premise establishing that the computer is not typically used in the operation of a business. The conclusion that access is justified is unreachable via this rule.

I got this question right but you have lost me entirely here. How is justified an unreachable conclusion via this rule. How is it not

Computer typically used in business -> Justified

Instead we're contrapositing the rule??? I genuinely don't understand. Is it just because of the grammar that we are interpreting the original rule as

Justified -> computer typically used in business

and turning it into

/computer typically used in business -> /justified

I just don't understand how using rule 1 we cant reach the conclusion that someone is justified. Especially when it says "One is justified if X".

Is this just sufficiency, necessity again? -_-

Lessons · [OPTIONAL] Lesson 7 - Coastal Estuaries

McSec

Wednesday, Jan 28

@DanielleMeuret You're my hero. This has been bugging the shit out of me.

Lessons · You Try - Political Debates

McSec

Monday, Jan 26

@tswalker83 Reading the question stem first is really the key for these I think, in terms of time. By the time you're done reading the first author, you should likely be able to infer what the second author will disagree with, allowing you to read the second author with the focus of understanding the specific point theyre disagreeing with. When you finish the second author, you should be able to put in your own words what they disagree with and then just hunt for the answer that matches.

Lessons · Motivation Break: Lauren McCarthy

McSec

Monday, Jan 26

Don't watch videos like this in Dark Mode, it gives you an inverted color jump scare