Do you need to be a subscriber? I cancelled my subscription after I finished the test.

I found during my study that:

1. The "why did I think this way, how should I have thought instead?" mental practice made a big difference. "Why was this wrong?" forces you to write down an answer and think about it deeply.

2. The review part is critical. If you only enter it once and never review, you miss out.

I made a WAJ app that helps with this exact thing. I'd love to get some feedback on it. It helps you record "Why did I get it wrong" then schedules review at specific times. I went from a 157 diag in August to 171 in November using it.

If you're making the same mistakes, it's probably because you're using the same reasoning underneath and not applying the new ones you learned from reviewing your WAJ.

The "My 250 word essay" is broken. No link to an essay.

I'd like to know as well

@DaisukeKaga Glad I could help. I highly recommend 7Sage's webinars from admissions councilors.

@JoshuaJJauregui Yeah you can totally do it, just ID what your weakest area is and drill that like crazy.

It's extremely important, but I can't quantify it. What I've been told by admissions councilors is that to maximize your chances, you want to aim above your target school's median LSAT. For most T14, that's in the 170's. Some in T14-25 are in the 160's.

I think that's realistic. That's basically two questions higher. What were you PT'ing at? November is coming up fast though, so commit to it and work hard for the next two weeks.

It seems like AC's A, B, and C have decent cases that could be made for them. They're all riddled with assumptions and implicit reasoning.

Anika implicitly has an alternatively plan, "Doing nothing", that could count in C.

"Arguing that (doing nothing) could achieve (more people willing to buy antiques) more easily than (hiring experts) (because it helps keep prices low)."

That being said, it's still not the right AC, probably because Anika is contesting the prediction, not the plan. She doesn't explicitly propose doing nothing, but it's obvious that's what she'd rather do.

B also has a good case:

Claiming that (they shouldn't hire experts) because, while (it would remove objects of questionable authenticity), it would (force them to raise prices).

But, if you believe "getting good value for their money" is the "effective", it doesn't flow well.

No live classes available for this one :-/

@Alex Jacobs I'll definitely do that. Looking forward to meeting you, Alex!

@Eric Hu I'm sure your wallet thanks you though

I haven't noticed it make a difference in my study in terms of how I make decisions. So far I've used it as a feature where I think "Neat", and I like to have it for record-keeping to gauge my confidence, but has no implications for further decision-making and seems somewhat redundant with blind review/flags. I flag every question I'm not sure about already, so it ended up just being "count the flags" (although when it showed up, I wasn't able to look at the flags, so I just estimated).

Perhaps I will find a way to integrate it and make better decisions later.

Aw, man! Are you having it on Friday, too? I'll be in NYC for that exact event but only Friday!

@David Busis Oooh exciting. Can't wait!

Which one of the following best explains this author's post?

A) He's a bot

B) He really likes computers

C) He's practicing for the LSAT writing but is really bad at thesis statements

D) He's trying to sell you a laptop on that website

E) Both A & D

I'd say that's a valid diagnostic. If you weren't able to think quickly, you'll have to get used to thinking like that. Begin the CC anyway because it'll help you build those patterns very slowly but then get faster at valid reasoning. You'll be encouraged by seeing your score go up those next few tests!

Hey I'm in a very similar situation! I'm taking in Nov, just broke 170 for the first time after being in the 160's for a while, and want to get 175 before then. 3 ish hours a day.

You should join a Discord server I'm active on!

https://discord.gg/DHgV7gpr4C

Isn't this just the same thing but integrated into the website instead of through that third-party table provider?

Hey AutonomousTacticalTheory! I've been developing a free wrong answer journal (with some paid AI features) to help me as I study and I've put it up so others can use it as well. Check it out at https://app.homeworkmuffin.com. I use 7Sage's notes section for recording my reasoning during blind review, but what I found is it gets hard to review them all in a structured way. It's a great supplement to the notes section offered by 7Sage.

@oliviaweekskristie539 Only double? ;-D That's pretty good. I'm going to take the W too! I was at least +1:19 on every one of them, and +7:01 on the worst. But I got them all correct. Anyone know how to get faster?