@jhbm90878 yes but that is just on example, they are saying a native or colonial tradition could be reinterpreted and that the jamboree example still fits.

The issue I am having is that B does not explain why the adjustment brings it closer to JT than away. As J.Y phrased it, seems like there is a range of data from confirming to conflicting. Who is to say that even if you only reexamined the conflict data that the adjustment wouldn't push it +1 or -1 away from JT's theory? For that reason, C makes some sense, as that would explain why adjustments benefit a theory, since they are choosing experiments that likely are yes than no, so a correction would likely lean more yes than no? idk