So, in sports if you rush while learning something or when you aren't confident in it yet, it usually leads to injury or learning a bad habit that is really hard to undo.

Same thing applies here. Don't worry about timing. Just worry about accuracy. Speed comes with practicing something that you learned slowly first.

Can't say I see why answer C is thrown out so easily.

It's asking what can be properly inferred if what is assumed. D says nothing about criminal organizations. C is saying that if we assume criminal organizations are already involved in every activity to generate enormous profits, then any new tech revolutions in biotech or info tech they would also get involved with since they've gotten involved with everything else that generates enormous profits.

If they have shown in the past they get involved with everything that makes enormous profits and something new is coming out that promises to generate enormous profits, why isn't that the correction assumption?

So...

Bird -> Migrate

butterfly /Bird

____

butterfly /Migrate Invalid

If it would have said the monarch butterfly doesn't migrate in the winter, then it would have been

Bird -> Migrate

butterfly /Migrate

____

butterfly /Bird

Which is valid because if you aren't in the necessary condition, you fail the sufficient.

Stated another way, multiple things can migrate south, but if you don't migrate south, you're not a bird.

Mapping this one out made it so simple for me. Actually feel like I made progress

Is this what I am to expect on the test? Missing a question because I don't know what a single vocab word means?

If this helps anyone...

late -> 5+

So, if someone is marked late then it means they arrived 5+ minutes after the bell. But, it's not the only reason to arrive 5+ minutes after the bell.

Maybe you went to the doctor and arrived 5+ minutes after.

Maybe you had a basketball game and arrived 5+ minutes later.

Maybe you didn't go to school at all, came the next day and arrived 5+ minutes after the bell.

This is how I viewed it.

This kind of puts my timeline out of whack. I was intending to take the LSAT in September.

I ended up getting this right but felt uneasy before answering. I was struggling a little finding the actual conclusion to this. Once I realized the warm sea statement wasn't the main conclusion but an "in between" conclusion is when it hit me that it was A.