I gotta say I really hate when I get the blind review when I'm right. Imo does more harm than good in that case because I'm totally rethinking my approach which was correct in the first place. I get that you're supposed to be more confident in your answers and it prevents totally rewarding people who simply guessed, but at the same time I had it right and then I doubt myself because I didn't totally reason out why another option (in this case, B) was incorrect

the police/not police stipulation is insane to me.

I thought “if true” meant we had to assume all the options were true

How else would an actor learn to play hamlet without a copy? Orally?

He seems like he's framing E is the answer that explains the findings when the correct answer is not sopposed to explain said findings.

I got confused because I thought all skeletons are made of bones

I really feel like their explanations for why a statement is conditional vs causal are really lacking because they hinge on, for example, "decreased mental functioning can be caused by another factor, like alcohol" when "3rd factor" is a very possibile answer for causal claims. Ultimately I think they should stress correct comprehension of the main verb.

aren’t we assuming the Genie+ things could not have been stolen