- Joined
- Feb 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Would B be correct if the stimulus talked about automobile accidents on all roads?
Also, is D trying to bait us into assuming that the high-spenders are bus users, and, if we grant this assumption, that Travallier is trying to target existing customers rather than new ones? Would be forced to make a lot of assumptions, but curious if that was the trap the test-makers were going for
My line of thinking: New stuff in conclusion = bad. The conclusion says it must be that they're looking for new customers based on their current customers' preferences. So, once I noted that relationship b/w current and new, and the hypothesis being about new, then I tried to search for one that affirms that it is actually the current customers who are being served. E does that.
@Hfa Spot on. One of the examples that I always run in my mind that seems to click for me is this: If you're elected president, then you're at least 35. Does this mean that there are people who are 35 that are not elected president? Of course! In the context of answer choice D, for example, it would be saying: Most people who are at least 35 are not elected president. Obviously, this could be true when thought about like this
Got it right, but how does "the only" in answer choice C not attach itself to "public opinion against the work"? I got tripped up on blind review b/c I thought "public opinion against the work" was the sufficient condition due to the indicator of "the only" and the referential of "reason"

Is this one of the rarer occasions where the correct answer weakens a premise? Or am I looking at the logical relationship wrong and answer choice C doesn't do that (or does something else that I'm not picking up on)?