not the Hawkman slander

was that a steamed hams reference

on my interface the stimulus was jumping back and forth, one word jumping from one line to the next line down making all the text move. This has happened on one previous question

If the hypothesis were indeed in the answer choices, would it be a weaker answer because of the language "the zookeeper concluded"? My thought is that the assumed truth would merely be that he concluded something, not that he was right. Am I thinking about this too much? Thanks!

I noticed that there are some videos, this one included, where the UI doesn't give me the option to increase the video's playback speed. is this intentional? Or perhaps an issue on my end?

anyone else feeling kind of daunted by just how much there is left in the CC? I'm not planning to test til january but still, woof.

That makes total sense. Thank you for helping untie the knot in my brain.

"Necessary satisfied yields no information about the sufficient."

I'm having trouble parsing this. My brain is saying that the necessary being satisfied in the case of an equation like "Fox-->Mammal" does yield info: that any fox is a mammal. Can anyone help me figure out what I'm missing?

Having a blast.

I noted the mammal assumption and then told myself I was silly for noting it. That's a nice signpost for how thorough I should be in noting these things.