Failed almost every "You Try", which I wasn't surprised by, because I'm terrible at flaw questions, but I just got 4/5, so there might be hope for me after all.

@JCSamson11 where are you seeing the whole question? I don't want to give the answer away before I have a chance to read it all.

Does anyone else dislike it when they only give a couple of answers at a time?

It's really helpful for me to think of this and the previous flaw with the buckets scenario. Think of it, if you only take some of the A's and put them into B, but then you take that entire bucket and put it into C, then of course there will be A's in there. But if you take all the A's into B (remember, we don't know how many A's that is, it could be literally 2), then take only some of that entire bucket into C, it's less likely that there will be A's in C. Hope this helped!!

So can many include all?

I understand that we can assume that Elias arrived 5+ minutes late and now that I've seen it I understand why the Kumar example is wrong, I just don't think I'd actually be able to see that on a more complex LSAT question. Also I need to see it visually and I just simply don't have the time to draw circles for every necessary assumption question on the test...

@Sheridan McGadden A couple lessons later and I understand why we needs this now...

IDK if it's just me, but I feel like translating it into a more algebraic form is confusing me more. Maybe it's because I wasn't good at math in school, but it makes so much more sense to look at it visually or in English than in Lawgic form. I know they previously said it doesn't always work visually, but it just doesn't click in my head when I see it lawgically.