This question is just asking for the definition at the beginning

I was tricked into trying to pick an answer from the Roman copies being passed off as Greek part, so I got it down to C & E and picked E.

this question is BS!

This is a question that I got right from POE

@lin.guo0714 ugh this one tricked me too

tricky wording

I think C, D, and E can be easily eliminated

Get this down between A and B... B says that "only 1 of 2 predictable consequences" but that is never mentioned in stim.

A is saying that they expect people to have saved money, but since their savings did not change, then likely their spending has not changed even though that is what was expected.

@WilRothman I missed 3 questions in this section... this question was one of them!

man i always get this one wrong when drilling after time passes

G -> /U

/LE -> /L

----------

G -> /L

MISSING: U -> /LE

Correct AC: (A) LE -> /U

(its contrapositive is what we need: U -> /LE)

@williamskoon597 to me theres just nothing in the stimulus to pick those

this question was just POE for me!

I struggled with this one!

Got it down between C and D.

Picked C (ugh) but I realize why D is right. The stimulus says A or B, rules out one and declares it must then be the other, and so does answer choice D.

Easier once you know the answer to see it more clearly.

I think the conditional in D was throwing me off, it wasn't similar to the stimulus.

But the biggest cue is to recognize that D, like the stim, declares an something from its set it offers by ruling out the other. C rules out but does not declare from what was given.

@ThisIsTorture AKA "assumes"

Got this easily down between B & C.

It def seemed circular.

Thought the newspapers could be bias... but didn't feel like it was something the author was assuming... there was nothing to suggest that it was assumed

Nonsmokers are irrelevant so it doesnt support the argument

lol the amount of time i had to spend on this..i got it right... but a lot of time

id prob skip this beause omg reading

yea bro f this question.. its hard and a time sinker!

if you put B in as another premise, the conclusion makes sense... its just a weird question though, its like a hidden assumption you think is already understood

why not C?

I get confused on D when it brings in a new concept (explicit) that is not mentioned ANYWHERE else.

@evelazquez513 very difficult, was really confused on this

i hate NA. This one was hard.

These new questions from LSAT are getting weird dude….

Ugh I thought b was right