@Kevin_Lin So are we talking about individual slackers and conscientious people, not as a group?

Can you elaborate on number Four Answer A? I do not understand how having more people in the workplace would not influence how likely it is for being hired. The more bodies in the workforce, the lower your chances are for being hired, regardless of skill/talent.

The answer explanation for E was not done correctly, you switched it up to a different example and never got back to the original question and answer

This does not make sense because Group Four Conditional means that you negate either and make necessary, in the case of the exampe he did the necessary part correct, but since there is a no in the beginning of of ansswer d. there should be a / before Indy. So therefore,

/Indy--->/Fish or Bird

HELP: So is it just what comes up first in the passage that dictates if the situation is a "Most before All" or "All before All"???

question isnt making sense, it should be a most before all shouldnt it

the fact that a different person is answering this and not using the concepts we just covered is very confusing

Was the F--->F to /(D-->F) turns into D <-S-> /F not taught anywhere before this???

wasnt it said earlier that "some" cannot have a contrapositive? or is negation different

Question one does not have "unless" as the indicator, it is "without"

Really glad this lesson is here, saves me a lot of anguish and wasted thinking