@juvargasc It be like that some times...

I took more time than I should, but I got it all right !😁

See I made the fatal deduction that the owner had consent therefore we exclude him from the equation only to realize in the blind review both are ignoring the the obvious answer... sat there like A is too stupid to be the right answer...

These questions are really hard given that you must identify the flaw AND find a flaw that matches. It's 2 questions in 1 with the same amount of time...

I decided to rush because the last lesson encourage over confidence...I got it right in the blind review...

@Lizeth13 the individual explanation why B is wrong makes more sense. In that they they're implying that it's not gonna happen but they didn't say that so we can't call it a flaw.

My only issue with this question is: what do you mean he knows very little? Hell for all I know he could only know that the break don't work and nothing else! Also drawn out questions (c I think?) was absurd whether you separate the bike from the breaks would still have the rule applied since the breaks are an item. In addition a bike with no breaks is absolutely defective.

@JosephAmoAppiah being mistaken/wrong is not the same as lying. If you got a math question wrong would you consider you've lied?

It took me a minute because the way A was worded got me confused than I realized B is more accurate because it confuses sufficient (water contains life) for necessity so there must be life in that moon because there's water there!

@WilRothman I'm not even a little surprised. Because they've let them do worse.

Thank God we're all on the same page!

@MadelainaFord we love to see growth!

How it feels to go into the blind review only to find that there's nothing circled 😌

Ugh I doubted myself thinking this one makes sense but it's so convoluted

I'm "traumatized" from SA/NA question that I see these as easier but still stressed 😬

@JessM thank you for being honest these questions types are tuff

@RyanAlexander

I'm genuinely shocked I got this question right. 🥹 Out here used the basic skills I had (negate and see if this destroys the entire argument) and it worked. Yhan I was like maybe this question is really easy and it's a level 5.

back to back 1st question wrong blind review right...

The answer for A doesn't make any sense to me because for you to ignore something you have to know its existing but not respond to it. If the failed to consider that would imply that they aren't ignoring it but are ignorant to the issue. How can you ignore something you didn't even know existed?

I didn't get it because I confused each for all... Since each institution has staff that are there for selfish reasons 8 didn't have any altruistic staff members to compare too.

@legallyhaya it may be more helpful to you (or others) if you used the show questions then move into the video as I was frustrated with this at one point.

I chose B over E because the manufacturer didn't take an action. They didn't take precautions which is inaction. B was saying only if it was preventable which could still apply to the rule since it was preventable...

I got the question wrong because I was looking for an answer that focused on perpetuity. I figured archeology was more so for academia sake 😭✌️

Question we are almost always supposed to believe that the stimulus are true as we're not looking for that. But how are we supposed to figure that this is an opinion when we both arguees are saying 2 different statements?