@AndrewPhillips I think I know where you're getting crossed up. The "No" is not a part of Idea 1 or Idea 2, the "No" is the solely an indicator. So, if you were to apply the rule to the idea of "One is invited" and "Did not RSVP," you would either get "One is invited -> /(Did not RSVP)" [which really means Invited -> RSVPd] OR you would get "Did not RSVP -> /One is invited." Does that make sense?

Really tripping me up how we are to imply connections between "well trained" and "avoiding training" in Q2 but then not imply connections between "expected to make tough decisions" and "cannot make tough decisions" in Q4 :(

5/5 but number four really tripped me out.

The lesson on negation versus opposition was really helpful here.

Yeah this one threw me for a loop. I really thought it was some cultivars of corn versus other cultivars of corn.

@LidwinaE. Bellla LOL nah fr