Maybe I was thinking too hard but I was thinking D did weaken because I was like well the trash made Hyenas double… they are predators of the baboons so it’s harming wildlife (the effect of trash increasing predators that affect baboons). Is that an overthought?

Does anyone else feels that D explanation makes sense but it was just worded weird?

@JoshuaCosmas ahh same missed that!

@DamiOye LOL same i drew lines (like the earth is round not flat idk why i drew lines sighhhh)

Looking at the video now and realizing this was a conditional question, could I also rule out A,B,D,E because they aren't conditional answers? Only C is.

@HollieRVA I followed this perfectly thank you

Hi Im also having this same thought. I don't have any helpful tips unfortunately, but I hear you. Also struggling with completing each day fully especially working full time and other priorities. Any tips?

Can someone explain why Q19 is Necessary assumption? How would i know?

Yall... I've only gotten ONE NA question right in this section... am I cooked :(

Not sure why the question stem threw me off "strengthen?" is this an SA or MSS? Idk why i was looking for missing link. B makes perfect since to strengthen

@ognikooo Same!!! Maybe there is hope in this life !!!

@KendallFrancis05 I hear you. You're not alone! Keep pushing and drilling (what im trying to tell myself). Had to just go to sleep and wake up try again haha

I truly have been struggling since WSE now this. Feeling a bit depleted and after trying question after question getting them wrong, not really sure how to switch my approach or understanding. Any advice?

@JPolus sigh same :/ assumed he was a member and that there were just multiple locations

This makes sense definitely was on track with everything... I just confused myself when i did contrapositve. It was initially (/comfortable--->/well designed) trying to understand why i did contrapositive like this: (comfortable ---> well designed) instead of (well designed ---> comfortable). Can some re-explain negation vs contrapositive?

Just to clarify for question 3:

So if you are infected with the virus and if one week has passed then you produce antibodies. So both having virus and after 1 week means it’s necessary to have antibodies

Contrapositive is= if you don’t produce antibodies, then you either don’t have the virus or it hasn’t been more than a week?

I think I’m confusing this because now the contrapositive to me sounds like it’s only necessary to have a virus (no matter how long) or a virus for a week or more long to develop the antibodies.

I guess my question is how do I interpret the contrapositive and connect back to original without changing the meaning the “or” makes me think now only 1 is necessary but in the first it’s like antibodies are necessary when you have both virus after a week. Hope I’m explaining my thoughts right.