@ChadBerry SAME

I chose answer choice D because it had direct evidence I could look back and point the evidence that supports it... BUT answer choice C and answer choice E were good options as premise states what a beginner typically does v.s. expert player does so to recalling/memory importance is important almost necessary to become expert.

Is there anyway to figure this question out without LAWGIC???????? I AM STRUGGLING SMMMMMM. #HELP

@taylor.g2901 It is confusing you are correct and I am with you on this!!!!!!! :(

I slipped up and picked answer D thinking the book contained 2 and not 3. I never thought it could just contain just 1.

So just because PD is sufficient it can be negated????????

Why couldn't it be: if you saw improvements -> mastered logic. I feel like improvements would be sufficient to master logic. Mastering logic would be necessary to see improvements? Why would Mastering logic be sufficient for seeing improvements? aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

@siglallie334 Ty! This made it so simple, my only question is why is it headlined "pick either idea..negate it..then make that idea sufficient" The headline confused me making me believe it was whichever idea could be negated and made sufficient

@JackCheston this helped a lot Ty

So if the key word is in the beginning the x —-> y is backwards……??..? I’m lost on #3 why wouldn’t it be if you’re the highest flying bird of prey you nest in the summits of Andes?

Why is it if you nest in the summits of the Andes you are the highest flying birds of prey? Is it a general rule if the keyword (only) is in the beginning it is going to be backwards ? Pls guide Ty

I wish I was guaranteed there would only be one conclusion!